• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >How might the experiences and perspectives of community participants collaborating in socially engaged art practices be heard, considered and equally valued alongside those of the artist and gallery? What ethical implications for the artist and the gallery arise when community participants’ experiences are considered in this way?
【2h】

How might the experiences and perspectives of community participants collaborating in socially engaged art practices be heard, considered and equally valued alongside those of the artist and gallery? What ethical implications for the artist and the gallery arise when community participants’ experiences are considered in this way?

机译：如何与艺术家和画廊一起听取，考虑和平等评价社区参与者参与社会参与艺术实践的经验和观点？以这种方式考虑社区参与者的经历会对艺术家和画廊产生什么道德影响？

页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Through this research I set out to highlight and address the absence of community participant voice in the analysis and critique of socially engaged art, mediated through the gallery. I bring into question bold assertions of positive and beneficial individual and communal experiences resulting from engagement in such practice when, without hearing from all involved, we are unable to fully comprehend its potential. It seems inexplicable that a practice based on the premise of dialogue, which claims to be striving for equitable relations and talks of collaboration, does not give equal weighting to participants’ points of view. This deficiency perpetuates unbalanced power relations between gallery, artist, and community, and may also lead to disingenuous collaborative experiences and unethical practice.\udAmplifying the voices of individual community members involved in Open House, a three-year community engagement programme initiated by Kettle’s Yard working in collaboration with artist Emma Smith, and considering these perspectives through a critical research lens, I set out to develop and present a more nuanced understanding of the value of socially engaged art practices to community participants. Furthermore, through genuinely listening to concerns voiced by individual community members, I consider the ethical implications for the gallery and artist.\udMy analysis and critique of Open House, alongside the responses and reflections of community participants, are used as a springboard from which to consider broader issues affecting the fields of socially engaged art and galleries. Through this research I hope to inform and enrich the work of galleries mediating socially engaged art.
机译：通过这项研究，我着重强调并解决了通过画廊进行的对社会参与艺术的分析和批评中社区参与者声音的缺失。我对参与这种做法所产生的积极和有益的个人和社区经验的大胆主张提出质疑，因为如果没有所有有关方面的来信，我们无法充分理解其潜力，那将是积极的。似乎无法解释的是，以对话为前提的做法声称正在争取平等关系和合作对话，但这种做法并未给予参与者以同等的重视。这种缺陷使画廊，艺术家和社区之间的权力关系长期不平衡，也可能导致虚假的合作经验和不道德的实践。我与艺术家艾玛·史密斯（Emma Smith）合作，并通过批判性研究视角考虑了这些观点，从而着手发展和向社区参与者展示对社会参与的艺术实践的价值的更加细致入微的理解。此外，通过真诚地听取社区成员个人的关注，我考虑了对画廊和艺术家的伦理涵义。\ ud我对开放日的分析和批判，以及社区参与者的回应和思考，被用作跳板。考虑影响社会参与艺术和画廊领域的更广泛问题。通过这项研究，我希望能为画廊提供更多信息，以调解参与社会活动的艺术。

著录项

  • 作者

    Plumb, Sarah Jane;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号